Before I begin this article let me make it absolutely clear ! It’s not the camera that matters it’s what you do with it !
I’ve been playing about with this photography lark quite a while now. Since I was about nineteen and I’m fifty four now. Am I fifty four ? I’m beginning to forget which is a little scary. Thought it would be nice to do a life in cameras article.
- Olympus OM-10 – I got a B at Art O Level. My Art teacher a Mrs Turner told me off because she thought I should have got an A. I didn’t think I was that good. Yeah I could copy draw and shade a pair of black leather shoes and maybe a teapot and some flowers but my free hand imaginative drawing was dodgy despite my portrait of David Bowie which hung on the wall of the Art Classroom for months. I was a frustrated artist and so photography appealed. My Mum bought me an OM-10 for my eighteenth and nineteenth birthday combined. With 50mm lens they cost I seem to remember about £110. The OM-10 was a good little starter camera. Well built and reasonably simple to use in automatic. The Zuiko lenses had a good reputation even though they were bloody expensive. Eventually I had the manual adaptor, Winder 2 and a couple of Tamron Zoom Lenses, the full kit. The problem with the Manual Adaptor was that the camera would indicate by little red light in the viewfinder which shutter speed it thought you should be using if in auto so you had to constantly check which one you were on when in manual. That said this aspect helped you learn quicker. The Pentax K100 was also a good little starter camera as well.
2. The Olympus OM1-n – Now you’re talking ! A bit more expensive than the OM10 these are still superb film cameras. Reliable, robust and amazingly simple to use. Fully manual correct exposure is indicated by a needle in the viewfinder which worked by one of those little round silver batteries. If the battery went flat it didn’t matter because you could still use the camera by either guessing the correct exposure or using an external light meter. I traded in my OM-10 to get one of these and eventually I had two OM1-n bodies. I still have one and I’m loathe to part with it. Pick em up on Ebay for a good price. The zuiko lenses are excellent as well.
3. The Pentax SFX – I actually won one of these in a national photography competition organised by Practical Photography magazine and sponsored by Ford Motors and Pentax. There were four categories and the overall winner won a Ford Escort Xr3i. I won one of the categories and got this camera, camera bag and a t-shirt. We had to go to a photography studio run by car photographer Taly Noy in London’s Dockland area ……..which was nice. Some models had been employed to give the prize giving a bit of glamour which irritated the shit out my girlfriend who fancied herself as a bit of a model as well but she wasn’t tall enough.
The Pentax SFX I wasn’t overjoyed with although I did get some decent images from it and in a sense it kicked off my street photography because it was fully automatic and autofocus, ideal for just pointing and shooting. I used to take it to football matches to do some crowd shots with it. At West Bromwich Albion they took it off me in exchange for a raffle ticket until after the match. It met a sorry end when I dropped it in the sea in Nigeria while cavorting with an attractive young lady from Angola. I tried to dry it off with my towel but the salt water got in it and when I switched it back on it started melting from the inside. Claimed back through the insurance.
4. The Nikon D300
I’m looking back on my life in cameras and beginning to think I’ve not had that many. The thing is I’m not an equipment nerd. As a reportage, documentary, street photographer the last thing you want is to be weighed down with kit and it soon adds up. Besides I just simply can’t afford to spend that kind of money. I’ve seen photographers with the latest cameras and the biggest lenses and they couldn’t take a decent image to save their lives. I once knew a bloke ( looked like a fat Roy Orbison) he had a Hasselblad and all the lenses, a Mecablitz Hammerhead flashgun, Benbo tripod, filters, the full works and all he did was take his appallingly bad Glamour Weekend colour print shots to Trueprint on the High St.
I digress. Back in 2009 I spent some of my redundancy and leapt both feet first into Digital. The Nikon D300 had good write ups. It cost a lot of money with the wide to medium zoom lens attached. Over the last few years I’ve had some pleasing images from it. Chunky and robust it was easy to handle. My mate a photojournalist gave me the best advice “treat it like you would the OM1-n” and so I did. Some of the menu facilities I still don’t understand but the D300 has a good reputation. The only regret is that it wasn’t Full Frame. It just irritated me that there was a calculation to make to work out the lenses, 50mm etc and trying to explain this aspect to a class of beginners is a real pain in the arse. Nevertheless I got some good paid work out of it and I hope it goes to a good home.
5. The Fuji X-Pro2
In all these years have I only ever had five ‘serious’ cameras ? In thirty years have I only had five cameras ?
It’s a crazy notion I know but the Fujifilm X-Pro2 is making me feel like I’ve finally arrived as a photographer. It feels like a serious photographers camera. The kind of camera that any photographer who knows his stuff will look at hung around my neck and say to themselves that dude knows what he’s about. I’ve done it myself, seen someone with a Leica and thought they know what’s what. Either that or they’re rich and they always buy the most expensive ? Don’t get me wrong, for I’m a firm believer and I always tell my students that it’s not the camera it’s what you do with it that counts. The X-Pro2 however doesn’t shout out loud about itself. It doesn’t draw attention to itself. It’s smallish, lightweight, rugged and modest looking. I’m still getting used to it, all the functions and after all these years with SLR’s the Rangefinder approach is taking some getting used to. As someone who shoots a lot of street type work it’s unobtrusive. Some might say it’s a poor man’s Leica but more than one person has told me they think it’s better than a Leica. I promised myself that my next camera would have prime lens as well so I got the 50mm F2 equivalent. The Nikon zoom lens on the D300 suffered from barrelling which irritated the hell out of me when shooting distant horizons on the wide angle. I’m looking forward to a few good years with this camera.
6. Other Cameras I Own